Ten tests. One question: did protection produce adaptation?

Policy → Capability takes a policy intervention — a tariff, subsidy, local-content rule or procurement preference — and asks three things: what was the protection supposed to buy, what was the industry supposed to build with that time, and did it actually happen. Every verdict is assembled from ten diagnostic tests, each backed by a traceable evidence trail.

The Evidence Model

No black box
Claim

The specific assertion under test.

Source

Where the underlying data comes from.

Evidence

The measured value or document text.

Interpretation

What the evidence means for the test.

Confidence

How strongly the data supports the claim.

Verdict

The status the test records — and why.

Every claim the monitor makes — down to "US manufacturers have not materially shortened EV product cycles" — can be opened to its historical baseline, current reading, named programmes, dates and source documents. The product is not the score; it is the audit trail behind it.

The Ten Tests

Same skeleton in every sector
01

Cost Architecture

EV-01: failing

Is the protected industry's unit cost converging on the global price floor?

Indicators
Pack cost per kWh vs. import parity; cost-reduction slope since intervention.
Fails when
The cost delta widens, or stays flat, under protection.
02

Product Cycle

EV-01: lagging

Are development timelines compressing the way competitive industries' do?

Indicators
Programme start-to-launch intervals per OEM against a declared target cadence.
Fails when
Cycle times hold steady or stretch despite the protected revenue buffer.
03

Vertical Integration

EV-01: on schedule

Is the supply chain actually localizing, layer by layer, not just assembly?

Indicators
Cell, pack, cathode and precursor localization shares; plant commissioning status.
Fails when
Final assembly localizes while upstream inputs stay imported.
04

Affordable Vehicle

EV-01: failing

Is protection buying products ordinary buyers can afford?

Indicators
Entry-model price points and median transaction price against the $30k line.
Fails when
Protection is absorbed into margin and mix, not price reduction.
05

Scale

EV-01: on schedule

Is physical capacity expanding on the schedule that was promised?

Indicators
Annualized assembly run-rate, announced plants at commissioning and volume.
Fails when
Announcements without commissioning, or commissioning without run-rate.
06

Productivity

EV-01: lagging

Is capital going into process redesign, not just more capacity?

Indicators
Labour-hours per vehicle; year-over-year productivity improvement rate.
Fails when
Output grows while hours-per-unit barely move.
07

Exports

EV-01: failing

Can the industry sell outside the protected market? The strongest adaptation signal.

Indicators
Export share of output and its destination concentration.
Fails when
Output stays captive to the protected home market.
08

Performance Targets

EV-01: failing

Does the protection itself carry conditions that can be enforced?

Indicators
Quantitative cost, price, export or localization obligations in the instrument text.
Fails when
Unconditional protection — adaptation cannot be enforced, only hoped for.
09

Exit Mechanism

EV-01: failing

Is there a scheduled end, review, or sunset tied to capability outcomes?

Indicators
Statutory sunset dates, fixed review schedules, graduation criteria.
Fails when
Discretionary review with no fixed expiry — protection persists regardless.
10

Technology Depth

EV-01: lagging

Has the rate of technical accumulation actually changed since the intervention?

Indicators
Patent and process-filing trend against the pre-intervention baseline.
Fails when
Filings track the old trend: protection changed the money, not the technology.

Verdict Logic

Deliberately neutral
Successful Industrial Policy

Costs fall, productivity rises, capacity is built, affordable products appear, exports recover, technology accelerates, and protection declines.

Protection Without Adaptation

Protection holds, capability indicators stall. Quarterly results improve; the construction schedule slips.

Protection Dependency

Protection rises while capability deteriorates. The industry needs the policy more, not less, each year.

The framework is not anti-tariff. If domestic costs fall, productivity rises, factories are built, affordable products appear, exports recover and protection declines, the system says so. "This protection appears to be working" is a legitimate verdict.

Protection Dependency

Derived metric

The delta between protected market price and the global price floor. A successful policy should show protection falling while capability rises. Protection up and capability down is dependency; both flat is stagnation; protection down and capability up is the exit condition.

Adaptation Rate

Derived metric

How quickly an industry converts protection into measurable capability. The intervention sets the baseline, the construction schedule defines the expected trajectory year by year, and each test is scored against that schedule — no forecasting, only measurement against commitments.

See it applied: US EV tariff, EV-01

Ten tests instrumented with live evidence trails and an 82% confidence verdict.